Legal Opinion

1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 14, 1986No. LCDC 84-CONT-384; CA A35143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks review of LCDC’s continuance order in its acknowledgment review of the Coos County comprehensive plan. Two of petitioner’s three assignments challenge LCDC’s approval of the county’s “reliance” on the Forest Practices Act, ORS 527.610 et seq, as the sole protection for Goal 5 resources that have been identified as conflicting with forest operations. For the reasons stated in 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Tillamook Co.), 76 Or App 33, 708 P2d 370 (1985) , adhered to as amplified 77 Or App 599, 714 P2d 279 (1986) , we agree with petitioner.

Petitioner’s remaining assignment is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Coos Co.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API