Legal Opinion

Primeau v. Acton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9777PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover possession of a mining tunnel. Judgment for defendant. Error to the District Court of Summit County, Hon. Francis E. Bouck, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

. Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Primeau brought suit against Acton under Section 175 Code 1908, alleging that he (plaintiff) was in possession of the A. R. K. Tunnel and Tunnel Site arid that during his temporary absence defendant took and remained in possession thereof, and asked an injunction to compel restoration. The court denied the injunction on the ground that a tunnel was not mining property within the meaning of the said section.

The judgment was reversed by this court and the case remanded. Primeau v. Acton, 66 Colo. 603, 185 Pac. 255, where the section in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Primeau v. ActonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pitchforth v. MacOmbSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API