Legal Opinion

Primeau v. Acton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Summit District Court, Hon. Francis E. Bouck, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

*604The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, on the 26th day of February, 1919, filed a complaint in the District Court of Summit County against the defendants, defendants in error, alleging the location and development of a mining tunnel under the provisions of section 2323 U. S. Rev. Stat. 1878, being an Act of Congress approved May 10th, 1872, entitled “An Act to Promote the Development of the Mining-Resources of the United States.”

The complaint fully sets forth a' full compliance with the law, and discloses an expenditure in excess of $6,000.

The complaint further alleges that on the 10th day…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. California Lustral Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Kelley v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Primeau v. ActonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API