Telegraph Co. v. Eyser
Supreme Court of the United States
On motion, by Mr. J. Hubley Ashton, for a supersedeas to the Supreme Court of Colorado Territory and the District Court in and for the county of Arapabo in that Territory.
Read the full summary
On motion, by Mr. J. Hubley Ashton, for a supersedeas to the Supreme Court of Colorado Territory and the District Court in and for the county of Arapabo in that Territory. The ease was thus : The Judiciary Act of 1789, after enacting by its twenty-second section that final judgments in the Circuit Court may be examined and reversed, or affirmed in the Supreme Court, the citation being in such case signed by a judge of the Circuit Court or justice of the Supreme Court, and the adverse party having at least thirty daj's’ notice, . . . continues : “And every justice or judge signing a citation…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne
This is an application for a writ of supersedeas or an order, to the Supreme Court of Colorado Territory, and to the District Court of the first judicial district in and for the county of Arapaho, in that Territory, commanding that further pro*426ceedings upon the judgment in this case be stayed pending the writ of error whereby the judgment was brought into this court for review. The judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the Territory on the 6th of September, 1873. On the 8th of October following the defendant sued out a writ of error returnable to this court. It was duly served and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BabbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kitchen v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Watson v. MayberryUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- The CorozalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.