Legal Opinion
Yankus v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 27, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pastoressa, J.), dated August 18, 2008, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants James R. Kelly and Manhattan Eye, Ear, & Throat Hospital which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
*1069Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
On June 24, 1999, LASIK eye surgery was performed on the plaintiff at the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rebozo v. WilenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Geffner v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Lyons v. McCauleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Thompson v. OrnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wall v. Flushing Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gallo v. ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Spera v. BuroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026