Legal Opinion

Geffner v. North Shore University Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*840The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeals from the intermediate orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to strike the answer of the defendant North Shore University Hospital (hereinafter North Shore) based on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. McCormick v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Rivers v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Deutsch v. ChaglassianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. DiLorenzo v. ZasoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Lesniak v. Stockholm Obstetrics & Gynecological Services, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Castro v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API