Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Blackwood

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 9, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

101 N.J. 500 (1986)

502 A.2d 1132

WALTER M. WHITFIELD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND APPELLANT,

v.

J. BLACKWOOD, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CHARLES TISCHLER, M.D., AND WILLIAM BOSS, M.D., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 6, 1985.

Decided January 9, 1986.

David R. Gross argued the cause for appellants Charles Tischler, M.D. et al., and respondent J. Blackwood, M.D. (Budd, Larner, Kent, Gross, Picillo, Rosenbaum, Greenberg & Sade, attorneys; Mr. Gross, Cynthia A. Matheke, and Donald P. Jacobs, on the briefs).

Amos Gern argued the cause for respondent and appellant…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Roman v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Buckley v. Estate of PiroloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Whitfield v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Brendel v. Public Service Elec. and Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API