Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Blackwood

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 9, 1986PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment as to defendant Dr. Blackwood is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinions below.

The judgment as to defendants Drs. Tischler and Boss is reversed, and the order of the Law Division denying a new trial is reinstated, substantially for the reasons expressed in the concurring and dissenting opinion of Judge Simpson, reported at 206 N.J.Super. 487.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitfield v. BlackwoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lanzet v. GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. State v. StantonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Anderson v. PicciottiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. State v. PapasavvasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. Diakamopoulos v. Monmouth Med. Cen.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API