Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Riley

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1961No. 18790PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

The Secretary of Labor brought this action under Section 16(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201-219, to recover unpaid minimum wages for four claimants employed by the defendant. The defendant did not contest the applicability of the Act, and the only issue below was whether the claimants had been paid at least a dollar an hour as required by Section 6 of the Act. At the close of the evidence, the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff’s evidence was so speculative that the jury could not reasonably determine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Mitchell Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reeves v. International Telephone And Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Reeves v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Caryk v. CoupeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  4. Wirtz v. Chain SinghDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1965
  5. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Bidwell A. Jones, Individually, and D/B/A B. A. Jones Casing CrewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API