Legal Opinion
Caryk v. Coupe
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 1987No. Civ. A. 84-0730PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.
This action is brought by 10 chauffeurs formerly with Admiral Limousine Service (“Admiral”) to recover past-due wages and overtime compensation for the years 1981-1984, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (1982), and the District of Columbia Mini mum Wage Act (“D.C. Minimum Wage Act”), 36 D.C.Code §§ 201 et seq. (1981). A trial to the Court was followed by extensive post-trial briefing.
I. Findings of Fact
Defendants George A. Coupe and Bernard Resnick, at all material times herein, have done business as Admiral…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chappell v. Southern Maryland Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Irma Halferty v. Pulse Drug Company, Inc. D/B/A Pulse Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Hicks v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Cuevas v. Monroe Street City Club, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Cooke v. RosenkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.