Legal Opinion
Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Taco Bell Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 3, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-B-2135PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Julie Reiskin (Ms. Reiskin) and Debbie Lane (Ms. Lane), who have disabilities requiring them to use wheelchairs for mobility, assert claims for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (1998), and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (“CADA”), C.R.S. §§ 24-34-601-24-34-605 (1998). Plaintiffs submit a motion to certify an ADA and CADA class action under Rule 23. After consideration of the motion, briefs, and counsels’ arguments at the January 29,1997 class certification hearing, I will…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Parker v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Moeller v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Association for Disabled Americans, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.