Legal Opinion

Brown Instrument Co. v. General Electric Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 22, 1940No. Nos. 8478, 8506PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

INCH,.District Judge.

The above suits have been duly consolidated for trial and will be disposed of by one decision.

By the first suit the plaintiff, Brown Instrument Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company, has sued the General Electric Company, alleging that the Shafer patent U. S. No. 1,583,496 owned by the General Electric Company interferes with the Phelan-Hotchkiss patent U. S. Re-issue No. 19,235 owned by the Brown Instrument Company, Title 35 U.S.C. Section 66, 35 U.S.C.A. § 66. A supplemental bill was later filed by the Brown Instrument Company…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Gibbs v. Triumph Trap Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API