Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Knott

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1908PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Bill in equity for an accounting, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk, May 14, 1901. At the hearing, which was before Morton, J., the evidence was taken by a commissioner, and it appeared that, from the year 1884 to October 28, 1896, the plaintiff was engaged in business in London, England, dealing largely in goods made by the defendant Boston Rubber Shoe Company, which goods, during the earlier part of the period, it sold outright to him, and,…

Read the full summary

Bill in equity for an accounting, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk, May 14, 1901. At the hearing, which was before Morton, J., the evidence was taken by a commissioner, and it appeared that, from the year 1884 to October 28, 1896, the plaintiff was engaged in business in London, England, dealing largely in goods made by the defendant Boston Rubber Shoe Company, which goods, during the earlier part of the period, it sold outright to him, and, during the latter part of the period, consigned to him to be paid for after he had sold them. The course of dealing between…

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

The principal question argued in this case is whether the finding made by the single justice, “ that the plaintiff was the owner of something which the parties called a good will,” and that the Boston Rubber Shoe Company, hereinafter called the defendant, agreed to pay the plaintiff for this quasi good will, should be reversed. Under the recognized rule, it is to be sustained unless upon the evidence reported it was clearly wrong. Elliott v. Baker, 194 Mass. 518. Lindsey, v. Bird, 193 Mass. 200.

There is great force in the defendant’s contention that, as the business which the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Elliott v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Hoxie v. ChaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Lindsey v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Mittenthal v. MascagniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Old Corner Book Store v. UphamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Electric Welding Co. v. PrinceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Martin v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Jennings v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Marshall Engine Co. v. New Marshall Engine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API