Legal Opinion
Chao, Elaine L. v. Day, Brittian P.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 24, 2006No. 05-5050PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge.
The A & D Insurance Agency and its President, Brittian P. Day (collectively, “Day”), appeal the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Department of Labor, Elaine L. Chao (the “Secretary”), under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Day contends that he is not a “fiduciary” within the meaning of ERISA § 3(21)(A)(i), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i), and thus not covered by the statute. We agree with the District Court and affirm.
I
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Kimberly Gordon v. Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Briscoe v. FineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. DayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Cook v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.