Legal Opinion

Nishiki v. Danko Meredith, APC

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 2018No. A147733Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/1/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR TARYN NISHIKI, Plaintiff and Respondent, A147733 v. DANKO MEREDITH, APC, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CIV533665) Defendant and Appellant. When an employee resigns without notice, California law requires the employer to pay all wages within 72 hours. (Lab. Code § 202, subd. (a)1.) If the employer willfully fails to do so, the employee’s wages continue as a penalty from that due date until the wages are paid, for up to 30 days. (§ 203.) This case considers an award…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API