Legal Opinion

City of Bangor v. Inhabitants of Etna

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 15, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

This is an action to recover for pauper supplies furnished to Arthur M. Clewley, his wife and two minor children from December 19,1940 to April 15,1942, and amounting to $620.17. It was heard before a Referee upon an agreed statement of facts. The award was for the plaintiff. The report of the Referee was accepted against objections, and the case now comes forward on exceptions. It is not in controversy that pauper supplies, during the period and to the amount designated, were furnished and that the statutory requirements relative to notice and demand were complied with.

The defense is that,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
  2. In Re HagueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. Moulton v. ScullySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  4. Conley v. Texas Division of United Daughters of the ConfederacyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. City of Rockland v. Inhabitants of LincolnvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Renner v. New Ulm Police Relief AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Avangrid Networks, Inc. v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. Avangrid Networks, Inc. v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  4. Renner v. New Ulm Police Relief AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. United States v. Sterling Islands, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API