Legal Opinion
Renner v. New Ulm Police Relief Association
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 14, 1969No. 41281PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, Janet Renner, in an action to recover benefits from defendant, New Ulm Police Relief Association, following the death of her husband, who died in the course of his employment on June 23,1966, from an accidental gunshot wound.
The matter was submitted to the District Court of Brown County on an amended stipulation of facts which reads as follows:
“The parties hereto, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the following are the material facts which apply to the within lawsuit and that the Court may consider and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago & Northern Pacific Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Board of Comr's v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Town of Walkerton v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Fort AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Alma v. Guaranty Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Chandler v. KroissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Hanson v. City of Granite FallsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Renner v. New Ulm Police Relief AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969