Legal Opinion
Bank of East Asia, Ltd. v. Pang
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1926No. 19791. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— The complaint in this action is based upon two drafts for tbe sums .of twelve thousand five hundred dollars and seven thousand five hundred dollars respectively. To the amended complaint, which will be referred to as the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff declined to plead further and elected to stand upon the complaint, with the result that judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which it appeals.
The facts, as stated in the complaint, essential to present the law question to be determined, may be summarized as follows: The appellant, the Bank of East…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Laudisi v. American Exchange National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Decatur Bank v. St. Louis BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Harper v. HochstimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- International Banking Corp. v. Irving Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Gluck v. Seaboard Surety Co. (In Re Eastern Freight Ways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. J. Aron & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928