State v. Smith
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
This was an indictment for obtaining goods by false pretences.. It contained four counts, three of which were quashed on the defendant’s motion, and to the fourth a nolle prosequi was entered. The error alleged is the sustaining the motion to quash the three counts.
The first position taken by the defendant’s counsel in -fcindi*490cation of the decision on that motion is, that the four counts . in the indictment charged four distinct felonies, and therefore rendered it subject to be quashed at discretion.
In Weinzorpflin v. The State, 7 Blackf. 186, a felony under the laws of this state is defined…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weinzorpflin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- People v. HaynesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
- People v. KendallNew York Supreme Court · 1841
- State v. RowleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
- State v. LathropSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. AikinMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Griffith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- People v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- McGregor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.