Legal Opinion

Raytheon Co. v. Tully

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 92-03097Published

1Opinion of the CourtHouston, J.

Plaintiff Raytheon Company (Ray-theon) brings this action against the defendants, its former attorneys, to recover damages resulting from the defendants’ alleged legal malpractice. Raytheon deposed defendant Neal Tully (Tully); in the course of Tully’s deposition, Raytheon questioned Tully concerning whether he believed that his representation of Raytheon complied with the professional standards of an average, qualified attorney. Tully’s attorney objected to the question and instructed Tully not to answer it. Raytheon now moves pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 37A to compel Tully to answer its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. American Hangar, Inc. v. Basic Line, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  3. Paparelli v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  4. Hearst Corp. v. A. Walk, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API