Legal Opinion
Katz v. Grifa
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 17, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barbara R. Kapnick, J.
Respondent Michael Grifa moves to dismiss the petition and notice of petition, pursuant to CPLR 3211, on the grounds that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this proceeding *204because the 10-day notice to quit is defective on its face and the petition does not comply with RPAPL 741. Petitioner Adam Katz cross-moves for an examination before trial of the respondent and discovery of any documents relating to the respondent’s relationship with the tenant of record.
The petitioner is the landlord and proprietary lessee of the premises known as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho LamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Park Summit Realty Corp. v. FrankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- Park Summit Realty Corp. v. FrankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Haberman v. WagerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyar v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Helping Out People Everywhere, Inc. v. DeichAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994
- First Federal Savings & Loan v. SoutoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994
- New York City Housing Authority v. WinklerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1998
- South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.