Legal Opinion
Faulkner v. Bank of Italy
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1924No. Civ. No. 2772PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action by plaintiffs for money had and received by the defendant in its savings department and credited to the account of the plaintiffs in the sum of $624.25. The plaintiffs had judgment and from this judgment and also the order of the court denying defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside the same the defendant appeals.
Before signing and filing findings in the above^entitled cause the learned trial court summarized the questions involved in a very clear and succinct statement, from which we quote the following:
“Plaintiffs are husband and wife. November 9th, 1920, they opened a joint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ayres v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Aebi v. Bank of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Noble v. DoughtenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Torrance National Bank v. Enesco Federal Credit UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- City Bank of Honolulu v. TennHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Cambridge Trust Co. v. CarneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Coneland Water Co. v. NickallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Indemnity Insurance of North America v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.