Legal Opinion
Isenbarger v. Farmer
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 29, 2006No. Civil Action 06-1054 (JDB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Petitioner, a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army, seeks a writ of habe-as corpus ordering respondent to discharge him from the United States Army on or before June 30, 2007, and to remove from his record all references to a purported extension of his active duty service obligation (“ADSO”) to June 30, 2010. Petitioner contends that the Army unlawfully extended his term of active duty based on retroactive application of a Department of Defense regulation to his contract. In response to an order from this Court to show cause why the writ should…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sharp v. Rosa Mexicano, D.C., LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Lake v. CravensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Smith v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- UNITED MOTORCOACH ASS'N, INC. v. WelbesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Toor v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.