Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Baker v. Noback

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1996No. 26845PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal requires this court to review the effect of the interplay between the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, case law interpreting those rules, and the Nevada Medical-Legal Malpractice Screening Panel statute, NRS 41A.

Appellant Roger M. Baker pursued a medical malpractice action against Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging and three doctors, including respondent Dr. Carl R. Noback. Because Steinberg Diagnostic is an entity not subject to the provisions of NRS 41A et seq., Baker filed an action against Steinberg Diagnostic on November 15, 1989, in order to protect against the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Home Savings Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Volpert v. PapagnaNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hollis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Boren v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. HarberNevada Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Las Vegas Sands, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cox v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Allyn v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rickard v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. D.R. HORTON, INC. VS. DIST. CT. (ARLINGTON RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASS'N.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API