Legal Opinion

Cosby's Heirs v. Wickliffe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 9, 1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CíIANUER Sf. Case 45. ■Cass* stated and decree % of the circuit Court. . Appeal from the Washington Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Chibe JusireE Simpson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Nathaniel Wickliffe, and B. Abell, two of the creditors of Dabney C.- Cosby, dec’d., instituted separate suits in chancery against his heirs, to subject to the payment of their demands, some estate which they eon-*203tended liad belonged to him in his lifetime, and was liable for the payment of his debts. To sustain the jurisdiction of a Court of Chancery, it was alleged that no person had administered upon his estate, and that his children and heirs at law, were non-residents. B. Abell administered on the estate during the pendency of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dillard v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Helm v. BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  3. Huffaker's Exr. v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API