Legal Opinion

Fuerst v. Semmler

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Mercer County, Nuchols, J. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFisk, J.

This is tbe statutory contest involving tbe nomination of a candidate of tbe Republican party for tbe office of county auditor of Mercer county. Tbe contestant and respondent and tbe contestee and appellant were tbe only candidates at tbe primaries for sucb nomination, their names appearing upon tbe Republican primary ballot. Tbe canvassing board found and certified tbat tbe appellant received 428, votes and tbe respondent 425 votes for sucb nomination; and a certificate was accordingly issued to appellant, certifying tbat be bad been duly chosen as tbe candidate of tbe Republican party for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. The People v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People ex rel. Williams v. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  5. Choisser v. YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Weber v. O'ConnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Fullerton v. SmizerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. McLeod State Bank v. VandemarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Kuhn v. BeedeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API