Legal Opinion

Interior Linseed Co. v. Becker-Moore Paint Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — How. Rhodes E. Gave, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.

This is a suit for damages accrued to plaintiff on account of a breach of contract of sale. Plaintiff recovered and defendant prosecutes the appeal.

The material facts and the conclusions of law thereon are clearly stated and set forth in an opinion of the trial judge, Hon. Rhodes E. Cave, filed at the time of giving judgment in the case in the circuit court. We copy this statement of facts and opinion as accurately reflecting our views on the questions here. Such statement and opinion are as follows:

“There is no controversy as to the facts in this case whatever, and they show that in October,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Whitmore v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Laclede Construction Co. V. T. J. Moss Tie Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John E. FERGUSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the FLYING TIGER LINE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Friedman Textile Co. v. Northland Shopping Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Montague v. StreetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Interior Linseed Co. v. Becker-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. McMillan v. Ball & Gunning Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API