Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Nicks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 2013No. Nos. A09-1641, A12-0348Published

1DissentGildea, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority remands this case to the posteonviction court for an evidentiary hearing on Appellant Nidjia Nicks’s ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. In doing so, the majority fails to apply well-established law regarding posteonviction evidentiary hearings and claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Applying our well-established law to the facts of this case, I conclude that (1) there is no need to grant a post-conviction evidentiary hearing because Nicks’s claim is based entirely on the trial record, and (2) when the posteonviction court’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wood v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API