Legal Opinion

Farmers Bank v. Wickliffe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 30, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 79 — ACTION BY FARMERS BANK OF WICKLIFFE AGAINST CHARLES WICKLIFFE ON NOTES.— Appeal from Ballard Circuit Court. Judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Judge Hobson

— Affirming.

*628The Farmers’ Bank of Wickliffe brought this suit against Chas. Wickliffe to recover against him on four notes executed by O. P. Beck and him to the bank, he being Beck’s surety. The notes'were as follows: July 17, 1905, $3,000, due in 12 months; October 5, 1905, $3,369.60, due in 12 months; February 23,1906, $4,000, due in 6 months; May 31,1906, $2,200, due in 3 months.

Wickliffe defended on several grounds. A trial was had of the case, which resulted in a judgment in his favor. From that judgment an appeal was taken to this court, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farmers Bank v. WickiffeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commercial Savings Bank of Carroll v. DunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Bates' Administrator v. LockeryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Wickliffe v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API