Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Bureau of Land Management
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PANNE R, District Judge.
On August 6, 2007, Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Report and Recommendation (docket # 92). Plaintiffs timely objected. The matter is now before me for de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
Background
Plaintiffs brought this action against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to challenge the proposed Willy Slide timber sale. Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction; a declaration that the challenged decision violated certain laws; a permanent injunction against line project until the BLM complied with those laws;…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sole v. WynerSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Joseph B. Williams and Leo Bazile v. Joseph L. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.