Roebuck v. . Carson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The judge dissolved the restraining order, but found no facts. It does not appear that either party requested a finding of facts. In such cases the determinative principle of law is thus stated in Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N. C., 32. “In injunction proceedings this Court has the power to find and review the findings of fact on appeal, but the burden is on the appellant to assign and show error, and there is a presumption that the judgment and proceedings in the court below are correct.” Angelo v. Winston-Salem, 193 N. C., 207, 136 S. E., 489; Lineberger v. Cotton Mills, 196 N. C., 506, 146 S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Angelo v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Lineberger v. Ruby Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Whitaker v. . ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Young v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930