Legal Opinion

Landa v. Schmidt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1961No. Docket 53, 54, Calendar 48,616, 48,617PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

These are suits to enforce a contract in relation to purchase of a bar in the city of Detroit. The preliminary sales agreement contained a proviso making purchase contingent on approval by the Michigan liquor control commission, but pledging the parties to take “the necessary steps” to effect the transfer.

On application for transfer of the license, the Michigan liquor control commission insisted as a condition precedent that the defendants, the prospective purchasers, divest themselves of a chattel mortgage and promissory notes pertaining to the furniture and fixtures of another bar in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. BeyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Fleming v. James S. Holden Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Tyson v. HerrleMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bunn v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Bunn v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Patterson v. Gala Realty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API