Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberto Rodriquez-Camacho

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1972No. 72-1849PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge:

Appellant pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California to one count of possession of a controlled substance (99 pounds of marijuana) with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). 1

On appeal he contends (1) that the words “intent to distribute” are inadequately defined, rendering the statute unconstitutionally vague, and (2) that the statute fails to state an offense against the United States. We affirm.

“Distribute” is defined by 21 U.S.C. § 802(11):
“The term ‘distribute’ means to deliver (other than by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. John M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. Joseph Samuel Kinsey, United States of America v. Albert KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Michael Carl VismanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. John C. KifferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API