United States ex rel. Attorney General v. Union Stockyard & Transit Co. of Chicago
Commerce Court
Petition for mandamus, on relation of the Attorney General, against the Union Stockyard & Transit Company of Chicago and others.
1DissentArch Bald, Judge
The petition is well dismissed as to the three respondents, with respect to whom it is found that neither the Elkins nor the interstate commerce act apply. It is held, however, that the Junction Railway Company is a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce, and therefore liable to publish tariffs and to make reports, and as to this I feel compelled to dissent.
Nothing of the kind can be predicated on the use which the Junction Railway Company permits of its tracks by the trunk line carriers as a connecting link, to haul by their own motive power through trains moving from one to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Colorado & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Union Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Belt Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.