Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 30, 2011No. 11-3280UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Richard Dumas, proceeding pro se, appeals the dismissal of his workplace discrimination suit against Proctor and Gamble (“P&G”). Because the district court properly found that Dumas failed to timely exhaust his administrative remedies, we exercise our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

I

Dumas was employed as a contractor by LaCosta, Inc. (“LaCosta”) and assigned to work at P&G’s Kansas City manufacturing plant starting in 2005. Between 2005 and 2007, Dumas alleges that he was subjected to discrimination in the workplace,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Montoya v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Turner v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Martinez v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andria Borsody v. Frontier Heritage CommunitiesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  2. Baker v. Key Maintenance, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  3. Bhatti v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  4. Kyomi Baker v. Transam Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  5. Lawrence v. Bonaventure of Castle RockDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API