Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Civil Contempt Proceedings Concerning Richard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1985No. 14733Published

1DissentWuest, Acting Justice

I dissent.

Criticism of the trial court for failing to hire a lawyer and defend himself is not justified. A writ of certiorari commands the party to whom it is directed to furnish a transcript of the record and proceedings so they may be reviewed by the court. SDCL 21-31-4. When a full return has been made, the court must hear the parties, or such of them as may attend for that purpose, and may thereupon give judgment either affirming or annulling or modifying the proceedings below. SDCL 21-31-7.

In this case, no written order was entered appointing Mr. Ellison, nor was there any written order…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. United States v. Nathan George DinitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API