Legal Opinion

Foy v. Reddick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Pulaski Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

This was a suit by Reddick against Caroline Eoy and others, to recover the possession of a house as personal property, situate in a street in the town of ’Winamac.

An answer was filed, containing the general denial, and *415another paragraph which it is not necessary to notice, as no question arises upon it in this court.

A jury being waived, the case was tried by the court, resulting in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was filed and overruled.

The only question presented here, which need be noticed, is, as to the sufficiency of the evience to sustain the finding of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Martindale v. Town of RochesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Griffin v. RansdellIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Price v. MalottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API