State v. Lee
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
Dave Lee, Manuel Acosta, and Sam Ficarro were charged with robbery. Lee and Acosta were found guilty as charged and as to Sam Ficarro a mistrial was entered. The defendants convicted have appealed.
The first complaint is made to the overruling by the trial judge of appellants’ motions, original and supplemental, for a bill of particulars and prayer for oyer. -
The motions, in substance, ask that the state be required to inform appellants under what section of the Revised Statutes it was prosecuting them; the time of day and the manner in which the alleged crime was committed ; and whether it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- State v. BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. MattioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- State v. DallaoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- State v. HaddadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- State v. VallerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.