Legal Opinion

Bartimmo v. United States

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 30, 2007No. Civil Action H-06-1317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Ernest E. Bartimmo and Estelle L. Bar-timmo’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 22) and Defendant United States of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 20). Having considered the motions, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines Plaintiffs’ motion should be granted, and Defendant’s cross-motion should be denied.

FACTS

Plaintiffs Ernest and Estelle Bartimmo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek tax refunds from Defendant United States of America (“the Government”) in the amount of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duffie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. McGann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API