State v. Delaney
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of three counts of sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal as to two of the counts, asserting that there was a material variance between the conduct alleged in the indictment and the state’s proof at trial. Defendant also assigns error to the imposition of Ballot Measure 11 sentences, ORS 137.700, on each of the three counts. We affirm.
In June 1996, defendant was arraigned on an information charging four counts of sodomy in the first degree. ORS…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. NussbaumOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. AlbenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. KuznetsovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007