Legal Opinion

In Re: Joseph Mole

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2016No. 15-30647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney Joseph Mole appeals the disciplinary sanction imposed by the en banc court of the Eastern District of Louisiana. The questions presented are whether the en banc court adhered to its own rules and procedures; whether it provided adequate due process; whether its factual findings are supported by the evidence; and whether its chosen sanction was appropriate. Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM.

I

Mole represented Lifemark Hospitals in a lawsuit against Liljeberg Enterprises. 1 Then-judge Thomas Porteous presided. Six weeks before the case went to trial, the Liljeberg parties retained…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Chaves v. M/V Medina StarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Crowe v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stacey Vetter v. Christine McAteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. In Re: Jonathan AndryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. In Re: Ryan RayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. In re Jonathan AndryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  5. In re RamosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API