In re D.R.B.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TYSON, Judge.
Douglas Scott Brizendine ("respondent") appeals from order entered terminating his parental rights to his minor biological child, D.R.B. We vacate and remand.
I. Background
Respondent is the biological father of D.R.B. Allen and Sheila Bolick ("petitioners") are D.R.B.'s maternal grandfather and step-grandmother. D.R.B. resided with his mother until he was ten weeks old. Respondent lived with D.R.B. and his mother for seven of those ten weeks.
D.R.B.'s mother left D.R.B. in petitioners' care when D.R.B. was ten weeks old. D.R.B. has resided with petitioners since that date. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Matter of HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- In Re ShermerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re T.M.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Jackson v. CulbrethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- COASTAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- In re D.L.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- In re D.A.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.