Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Company v. Teixeira

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided June 28, 1963No. Civ. 2052PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAVARES, District Judge.

In its complaint in this action, plaintiff alleges that it is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York and that its principal place of business is in a state other than the State of Hawaii; that the defendants named in representative capacities have such representative capacities and that all defendants are citizens of the State of Hawaii. Plaintiff further alleges that on January 5,1961, effective for one year, it issued to defendant, Antone Teixeira, a “Family Automobile Combination Policy;” that on or about June 28, 1961,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JanichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
  5. Collier v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Olokele Sugar Co. v. McCabe, Hamilton & Renny Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Allstate Insurance v. DanielsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Aetna Ins. Co. v. PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS ASS'NDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. HoodDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API