Legal Opinion

Owens v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1924No. Civ. No. 4748PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff instituted proceedings in mandamus to require the defendants to reinstate her as a perma nent teacher in the elementary schools of the Santa Cruz school district. Her petition contained the essential averments of facts showing the legal duty on the part of the defendants, her demand that they perform it, their refusal, and her right to the enforcement of the duty. These allegations were not denied except through the pleader’s conclusions, but two separate defenses were interposed—the first setting up a written contract between the plaintiff and another school district by reason of…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Abraham v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mitchell v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Sherman v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Blalock v. RidgwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Gastineau v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API