Legal Opinion

DeWolf v. Casteliano

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 26, 1944Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, P. J.

Action of tort for a dog bite. The plaintiff in her declaration alleges that the dog bit her when she was not committing a trespass or other tort and was not teasing, tormenting or abusing the dog. She does not there allege that she was in the exercise of due care. The defendant’s answer was a general denial, contributory negligence, that the plaintiff was committing a trespass when she was bitten; and that the defendant was neither the owner or keeper of the dog.

At the trial it was admitted that the defendant was the keeper of the dog.

*150In a “Memoranda: Bequests for Bulings and Findings of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Strong v. Haverhill Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Himelfarb v. Novadel Agene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Slocum v. Natural Products Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API