Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Foley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 14, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Coubt by

Judge Baird

— Affirming.

Malissa Hutchins and Mose Hutchins, her husband, appeal from a judgment setting aside and holding for naught a deed made to Malissa Hutchins by P. E. Foley, her father. They insist: (1) That because appellees took the deposition of Malissa Hutchins as on cross-examination before taking the deposition of appellees, that fact precluded the introduction of appellees as witnesses in chief on the trial of the action, and, (2) that the judgment was not supported by the weight of the evidence.

Section 606, subsection 3, Civil Code of Practice, provides:

“No…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schrodt's v. SchrodtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Wathens v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Chrisman v. QuickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Bodine v. BodineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Johnson v. StiversCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Craddock v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Brown v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  3. Averitt v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  4. Davis v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API