Legal Opinion
Continental Copper & Steel Industries, Inc. v. Bloom
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 30, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant for his refusal to accept and pay for certain fuel oil tanks which the plaintiff had manufactured pursuant to a contract with him. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.
The defendant was a dealer in fuel oil tanks which he purchased from suppliers and sold to building contractors. In September, 1947, it was virtually impossible to obtain steel and there was a consequent shortage of fuel oil tanks. The plaintiff was engaged chiefly in the fabrication of steel pipe and had steel plate available for that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Jordan, Marsh & Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Charles Street Garage Co. v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Torkomian v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Bradford Novelty Co. v. Technomatic, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. Brooks HauserDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Vending Credit Corp. v. Trudy Toys Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1969
- Design Tech, LLC v. MoriniereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.