Legal Opinion
Agricultural Insurance v. A. Rothblum, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1933PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiff insurance company issued a “ Jewelers’ Block Policy ” to Harry Neumark. The policy was for $100,000 and covered, among other property, diamonds while in Neumark’s custody or possession or in that of others on memorandum. Neumark delivered diamonds to the defendant on memorandum. While in defendant’s possession they were lost. Thereupon the plaintiff paid Neumark $12,000 in settlement of the loss. The plaintiff now maintains that it made the payment to Neumark “ pursuant to the terms and conditions of the ” policy and that by virtue thereof it became subrogated to the rights and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Koehler v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- First National Bank of Ballston Spa v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- O'Connell v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- O'Connell v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Zaidens v. SalterCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company v. Julien Balogh and Harriet Balogh, D/B/A Balogh's of Coral GablesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Green Bus Lines, Inc. v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. PostinWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Balogh v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.