Legal Opinion

Jones v. St. Louis Land & Cattle Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1914No. 203PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. The facts, which involve the title of the parties to certain Mexican land grants, are stated in the opinion. The Jefe Politico was never authorized to grant lands. The Spanish system was abrogated by Independence. The Plan of Iguala did not continue Spanish system. The Spanish system was abolished by law of .1823. There is no presumption in favor of the Beck grant. The survey of the Beck grant gives no preference.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. The facts, which involve the title of the parties to certain Mexican land grants, are stated in the opinion. The Jefe Politico was never authorized to grant lands. The Spanish system was abrogated by Independence. The Plan of Iguala did not continue Spanish system. The Spanish system was abolished by law of .1823. There is no presumption in favor of the Beck grant. The survey of the Beck grant gives no preference. The confirmation of the Beck grant does not relate back to the date of the application to Surveyor General. In support of…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

In the year 1876 this suit was instituted by William P. Beck et al. for the purpose of determining the title of the parties to what is known as the Preston Beck grant, and for a partition of the same. This grant conflicts with a certain other grant, known as the Perea grant, to the extent of about 5,000 acres. In the year 1903, Andrieus A. Jones, appellant, was appointed receiver of the Beck grant and entered into possession of it, including the land in conflict. The St. Louis Land & Cattle Company, appellee, filed an intervening petition in the cause and set up a claim to the land in'…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Henshaw v. BissellSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Tameling v. United States Freehold and Emigration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Astiazaran v. Santa Rita Land & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deaton v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Cartwright v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Board of Trustees of Anton Chico Land Grant v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Murphy v. ProvinceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Yeast v. PruDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API