Legal Opinion

Lapiska v. Lapiska

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1964No. Appeal, 250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

In this appeal from a decree in divorce a.v.m. the wife-appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to establish that husband-appellee is an “innocent and injured spouse” or that she committed such indignities to his person as to render his condition intolerable arid his life burdensome.

To make proper disposition of this appeal, we performed our required duty of carefully reading the entire record of the testimony, which is unnecessarily long, and have made an independent determination of the credibility of the parties and their witnesses. Although we have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Lowe v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Shoemaker v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Simons v. SimonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Harding v. HardingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keller v. KellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Narbesky v. NarbeskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Dukmen v. DukmenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Dukmen v. DukmenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API